The Bin Ladens contained an extraordinarily large amount of information to process, and I suppose I could have given my brain a break and followed it with fiction, but I'm really enjoying my non-fiction streak I've had the last few months. It's given me a lot of information on a lot of topics, and I thrive off of facts. I'm the kind of person who likes having a little bit of knowledge on any topic life can throw at me. My mom is also a statistician, so I'm used to having the world explained to me through numbers, trends, and other stats. Superfreakanomics is the follow up to Freakanomics, a book written by economists that connected seemingly unrelated phenomena and concepts using numbers. Each chapter has a different attention-grabbing title such as "How is a street prostitute like a department-store Santa?" or "Why should suicide bombers buy life-insurance?" The concept of the Freakanomics books is similar to Malcolm Gladwell's work, but I have a strong preference for these books. Gladwell attempts to make very over-arching universal lessons out of his conclusions he makes by viewing the world through an economist's lens, which bothers me. I think anyone who thinks they've made sense of the entire world that quickly is quite frankly full of crap. Plus his statements might be cool or shocking, but you can't apply any rule or conclusion to the whole world, life isn't that simple and neither are people. Superfreakanomics instead gives you food for thought, and is open-ended in the sense that it allows you to decide how you will interpret and use the information it provides.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Superfreakanomics
I have in the past couple of week finished the Bin Ladens. I must admit I didn't read it all the way through in the assigned chronological order. It's a fascinating book, and very well-researched, but for me it was maybe a bit too well-researched. Steve Coll went into every detail that he could have possibly dug up about the past three generations of the Bin Laden family. It's an amazing feat and the book is a great source for information, but the very detailed and informative nature could get into the mundane at times. It would be a great source for any form of research however. The style reminded me a lot of Freedom at Midnight, the book I read on partition in conjunction with my Junior research paper. They both alternate between stories and narrations of facts and jump around in time a lot to propel the writing. They also have themed chapters that are organized in similar manners.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This sounds very interesting. Are you the only one who is reading non fiction for their free read? What other non fiction books have you read this year? Can you ever detect biases when reading these books? I would imagine that in non fiction books, especially about people or events not necessarily like Superfreakanomics, that the biases of the author come through more easily. These books don't sound like easy reads, especially the Bin Ladens. But I definitely understand what you were saying about wanting to know a little bit about everything. Personally I like historical fiction because it has an interesting story around a real event. Do you not like Superfreakanomics? Or does it make you angry to read as you detect the authors full-of-crapness? Overall these books sound really cool, but personally I don't know if I could deal with all of the non fiction-ness for a free read. Keep me posted on Superfreakanomics!
ReplyDeleteThe Bin Ladens seems like a book I'd really enjoy. It's right up my alley with the non-fiction I've recently read and I'm glad that you also enjoy non-fiction. You proved that you read like a writer when you mentioned the structure of the book and I think being able to recognize this adds to the story because you get different points of view. Superfreakanomics seems interesting and you've actually convinced me to look into it. The chapter titles seem really fun and the entire concept of the book sounds great. By the way, I your blog posts are sweet and to the point, which is nice.
ReplyDeleteTo answer Emily's question, Asha is not the only one reading non-fiction. You might check out Aaron Raus's blogs (he read Gladwell's "Outliers"). Ahsa, I will be interested in what you dig out about the difference in rhetorical stance between Gladwell and Dubner/Levitt.
ReplyDelete